• Home
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Share Your Story
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
Voice For Men
ads
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
Voice For Men
No Result
View All Result
Home IN THE NEWS CRIME HAS NO GENDER

READ JUDGEMENT | Woman Can Also Be Held Guilty Of Gang Rape If She Has Facilitated Act Of Rape With Group Of Persons: Allahabad High Court

The accused woman had approached the High Court arguing that being a woman, she could not be prosecuted for the alleged commission of the offence of gang rape

Team VFMI by Team VFMI
February 16, 2023
in CRIME HAS NO GENDER, HIGH COURT, IN THE LAW, IN THE NEWS, NON TIER-I CITIES
0
voiceformenindia.com
READ JUDGEMENT | Woman Can Also Be Held Guilty Of Gang Rape If She Has Facilitated Act Of Rape With Group Of Persons: Allahabad High Court (Representation Image)

READ JUDGEMENT | Woman Can Also Be Held Guilty Of Gang Rape If She Has Facilitated Act Of Rape With Group Of Persons: Allahabad High Court (Representation Image)

438
VIEWS

In a welcome move, the Allahabad High Court in its judgement dated February 13, 2022 observed that a woman can not commit the offence of rape, but if she facilitates the act of rape with a group of people then she may be prosecuted for ‘Gang Rape’ under Section 376D Of IPC in view of the amended provisions.

The accused woman had approached the High Court arguing that being a woman, she could not be prosecuted for the alleged commission of the offence of gang rape.

READ ORDER | Gang Rape Case Nothing But Abuse Of Process Of Court To Falsely Implicate 4 Real Brothers, 81-Year-Old Father: Allahabad High Court

Case:

The alleged incident of gang rape of a 15-year-old girl took place in June 2015. An FIR was lodged by the informant against unknown persons in July 2015 under sections 363 and 366 IPC alleging that someone had enticed away the daughter of the informant and took her with him.

In her Section 164 CrPC statement, the victim stated that the applicant Sunita Pandey (accused woman) was involved in the alleged incident, however, she was not named in the charge sheet. Thereafter, opposite party no. 2 filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning the applicant and the court below allowed the said plea in December 2018.

READ ORDER | Nowadays False Rape Cases Have Increased; Allahabad High Court Orders Refund Of Compensation Paid To Victim

Defense by Accused Woman

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that his client is a lady hence no offence under Section 376-D IPC is made out against the applicant and she has been wrongly summoned by the trial court. It was further argued that the applicant has been summoned in exercise of powers conferred under Section 319 Cr.P.C. solely relying upon the statement of Victim (P.W-1) as well as some other extraneous documents, which in fact is not sufficient.

He contended that in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the impugned order under challenge is vitiated by manifest error of law and amounts to blatant miscarriage of justice, and, therefore, is liable to be quashed.

READ ORDER | Allahabad HC Fines Rs 10K Cost On Woman For Filing False Rape FIR To Build Pressure On Accused For Marriage

Trial Court

Pandey moved court under Section 482 CrPC after being summoned by Additional District and Sessions Judge- Ist, Siddharth Nagar to face the trial u/s 376-D, 212 IPC in connection with the alleged rape case of a 15-year-old girl. When the court rejected her plea, she approached High Court.

Allahabad High Court

 

The Allahabad High Court too rejected Pandey’s plea to quash the summoning order as well as to stay the further proceedings in the case. Pandey’s primary argument remained that she could not be prosecuted for rape on the ground that she was a lady, thus no offence under Section 376-D IPC is made out against her and that she has been wrongly summoned by the trial court.

After perusing the provisions of Section 375 and 376 IPC (as amended by Act 13 of 2013 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860), the bench of Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav rejected the argument that a woman cannot be prosecuted for rape. 

Allahabad High Court Acquits Man Who Spent 20-Years In Jail On False Rape Charges Under SC/ST Act

Incorrect Interpretation

 

At the outset, the high court noted that the argument that a lady cannot be prosecuted for gang rape is not correct as per the amended provisions of Section 375 to 376E IPC by Act 13 of 2013 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Court observed that though it is clear by the non-ambiguous language of section 375 of IPC that a woman can’t commit rape as the section specifically states that the act of rape can only be done by a ‘man’ and not by “any woman”, however, the Court added, the same is not the case with Section 376D (Gang Rape). The Court remarked:

The term ‘person’ used in the Section should not be construed in a narrow sense. Section 11 I.P.C. defines ‘person’ as it includes any company or association or body of persons whether incorporated or not. The word ‘person’ is also defined in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary in two ways: firstly, it is defined as ‘an individual human being’ or ‘a man, woman, or child’; and, secondly, as ‘the living body of a human being’.

As such, a woman can not commit the offense of rape but if she facilitated the act of rape with a group of people then she may be prosecuted for Gang Rape in view of the amended provisions. Unlike man, a woman can also be held guilty of sexual offences. A woman can also be held guilty of gang rape if she has facilitated the act of rape with a group of person.

No Anticipatory Bail To Rape Accused Or Those Booked Under POCSO | Uttar Pradesh Government Passes Bill

Scope of ‘Gang Rape’

The High Court also explained the scope of ‘Gang Rape’ by observing that in order to establish an offence under Section 376-D IPC, the prosecution has to adduce evidence to indicate that one or more persons had acted in concert and in such an event, if rape had been committed by even one, all the accused will be guilty irrespective of the fact that victim had been raped by one or more of them.

In other words, the Court clarified that this provision embodies a principle of joint liability and the essence of that liability is the existence of common intention that common intention presupposes prior concert which may be determined from the conduct of offenders revealed during the course of action.

Assam Court Sends Woman To Judicial Custody For Filing False Rape Case Owing To Land Dispute Between Her & Accused

Dismissing the accused woman’s plea, the Allahabad High Court said,

Keeping in view of the aforesaid facts and law laid down by the Apex Court, I find no scope for interference in the impugned order passed by the trial court at this stage. The application has no force and is accordingly dismissed.

LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW:

READ JUDGEMENT | Woman Can Also Be Held Guilty Of Gang Rape If She Has Facilitated Act Of Rape With Group Of Persons: Allahabad HC

▪️Accused Suneeta Pandey: "Being a woman, I can't be prosecuted for alleged gang rape"#CrimeHasNoGender#VoiceForMenhttps://t.co/AmdxjW5UyN

— Voice For Men India (@voiceformenind) February 16, 2023

Image

 

DO WATCH:

Pooja Bedi Shares Why She Chose To Become Part Of India’s Sons Documentary | Voice For Men India

 

 

READ JUDGEMENT: Suneeta Pandey vs. State Of U.P. And Another

 

 

Suneeta-Pandey-vs.-State-Of-U.P.-And-AnotherDownload

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Donate to Voice For Men India

If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)

Donate Now (80G Eligible)

Follow Us

Tags: #CrimeHasNoGenderAllahabad High Courtcrimes by womengender biased lawsin the lawIn the Newsspeak up men
Team VFMI

Team VFMI

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us To Spread The Cause
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
mensdayout.com

Husband Sends Wife To NZ On Study Visa By Paying Rs 21 Lakhs | Wife Blocks His Mobile After Reaching

October 2, 2019
mensdayout.com

Daughter Takes Mum On Her Honeymoon; Months Later Mother Is Pregnant With Son-In-Law

January 20, 2020
mensdayout.com

Mumbai Shocker | 16-Year-Old Porn Addict Girl Forces Younger Brother For Sex Against His Consent; Now Pregnant

August 28, 2021
mensdayout.com

Accountant Left 24-Page Suicide Note Alleging Harassment And Infidelity By Wife

23
mensdayout.com

ASCI Upholds Complaint | CARS24 Sexist Ad To Be Modified Or Withdrawn By June 17

16
mensdayout.com

“I Curse Myself For Getting My Son Married As Per Indian Laws”: Story Of A Senior Citizen Father

15
voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025

Follow Us

Recent News

voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

January 27, 2025

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates in your inbox!

    Voice For Men

    Voice For Men India publishes articles about Men's Rights, Gender Biased Laws, Impact on Children of Separated Parents & His Story. Do check out the "Other Side.

    Follow Us

    Browse by Category

    • 498A CASES
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • BLOGS
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • GENDER STORIES
    • HIGH COURT
    • HIS STORY
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • IN THE LAW
    • IN THE NEWS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
    • MURDER
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • OTHER COURTS
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
    • SUICIDE
    • SUPREME COURT
    • Uncategorized

    Recent News

    voiceformenindia.com

    Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

    April 26, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

    April 25, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

    January 31, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    ‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

    January 27, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Delhi High Court Calls For Gender Neutrality In Domestic Violence Cases | Voice For Men India

    January 24, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Can Mother Be Accused Of Abetting Son’s Girlfriend’s Suicide If She Asked Her “To Die”: Supreme Court Responds

    January 23, 2025
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Share Your Story
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    © 2019 Voice For Men India

    No Result
    View All Result
    • HOME
    • IN THE NEWS
      • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
      • 498A CASES
      • MURDER
      • SUICIDE
      • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
      • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
      • ADULTERY
      • ALIMONY
      • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • IN THE LAW
      • HIGH COURT
      • SUPREME COURT
      • OTHER COURTS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
      • GENDER STORIES
      • BLOGS
    • HIS STORY
      • SPEAK UP MEN
      • SUCCESS STORY
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी

    © 2019 Voice For Men India