What High Court Noted:
- The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently quashed a ‘rape case’ against a man on the ground that the consent for sex was granted by the prosecutrix even after knowing very well that the accused would not marry her
- The court took note of the statement of the female prosecutor recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C, and observed that the same clearly indicates that after the refusal of the applicant to marry her, the prosecutrix choose to continue the relationship with the applicant
- It is not a case that the consent for sex was granted by the prosecutrix due to false promise of marriage given by the applicant, but was granted because the prosecutrix was also in love with the applicant and wanted to remain in his company
CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGEMENT
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
Blogging about Equal Rights for Men or writing about Gender Biased Laws is often looked upon as controversial, as many 'perceive' it Anti-Women. Due to this grey area - where we demand Equality in the true sense for all genders - most brands distance themselves from advertising on a portal like ours.
We, therefore, look forward to your support as donors who understand our work and are willing to partner in this endeavour to spread this cause. Do support our work to counter one sided gender biased narratives in the media.
To make an instant donation, click on the "Donate Now" button above. For information regarding donation via Bank Transfer, click here.
Alternately, you can also donate to us via our UPI ID: [email protected]
Follow Us
