• Home
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Share Your Story
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
Voice For Men
ads
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
Voice For Men
No Result
View All Result
Home IN THE LAW HIGH COURT

READ JUDGMENT | Mother Equally Responsible To Restore Child’s Strained Relationship With Father: Delhi High Court

Team VFMI by Team VFMI
September 25, 2023
in HIGH COURT, IMPACT ON CHILDREN, IN THE LAW, IN THE NEWS
0
voiceformenindia.com
READ JUDGMENT | Proven Adultery By Wife Cannot Be Sole Grounds To Deny Her Children's Custody As Mother: Delhi High Court (Representation Image)

READ JUDGMENT | Proven Adultery By Wife Cannot Be Sole Grounds To Deny Her Children's Custody As Mother: Delhi High Court (Representation Image)

527
VIEWS

The Delhi High Court in its order dated September 15, 2023 observed how a child becomes the worst victim due to warring parents embroiled in matrimonial disputes. 

The High Court was hearing an appeal made by the father after the wife did not comply with the child visitation order as passed by the Family Court. In fact, the Family Court too, left the meeting between father and minor son, to the wishes of the latter.

READ ORDER | Gujarat High Court Acknowledges Shared Parenting Concept; Orders Child Rights NGO Report To Be Circulated Amongst Judicial Officers

Case:

Parties got married in December 2004 according to Hindu rites and customs. After many years into the marriage, the couple adopted a male child, who is 13-years of age as on date. 

Parties got separated in the 2021 and since then the son is under exclusive custody of the mother.

The father then filed the Petition under Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 seeking custody of the minor son. 

In August 2022, the Family Court permitted the appellant/father to pick up the child on every Sunday at 12:00 noon from the house of the respondent/wife and drop him back at around 02:00 P.M. on the same day.

Since the wife failed to comply with these orders, facilitating meeting between father and the son, the former had to file yet another application under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 requesting court that the child may be directed to be brought to the Children’s Room for meeting him.

Distressed Over Losing Daughter’s Custody After Divorce, Kolkata Man Dies By Suicide | Parental Alienation | Shared Parenting

Submissions by Father

The father pleaded that was no effective compliance of the August 2022 order granting visitation rights on every Sunday from 12:00 Noon to 02:00 P.M. which is essentially increasing the gap between the appellant/father and his son, which is not in his welfare. Therefore, to facilitate interactions it was requested that the child be produced in the children’s Room for effective and meaningful meetings.

Defense by Mother

The respondent, on the other hand, had claimed that she never obstructed the visitation rights, but the son is now aged about 13 years and has extreme reluctance in meeting with the appellant/father. The child is grown up enough to exercise his own discretion and there is no way that she can compel the child to meet the appellant/father. The child himself has refused to interact with the appellant/father and she has no role to play if the child is not willing to go with the appellant/father on every Sunday as directed by Family Court. 

READ ORDER | Except Bihar, Consent From All States Have Been Received With Regards To Shared Parenting: Union Of India Counsel To Punjab & Haryana HC

Family Court, Saket 

In May 2023, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, observed that he had interacted with the child in the Chamber who is aged about 13 years and is studying in Class-VIII. The learned Principal Judge further observed that the child was having sufficient maturity to decide the meeting with the appellant/father and found that there existed no ground to direct the production of the child in the Children’s Room for meeting and accordingly, the Application under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 of the appellant/father was dismissed.

Aggrieved by this dismissal order, the appellant/father approached High Court. 

READ ORDER | Parents Cannot Be Guest In The Life Of Children; Tripura HC Orders Shared Parenting

Delhi High Court

At the outset, the division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed that a minor’s age and the surrounding circumstances of the period of separation from a parent are relevant while considering his or her ‘intelligent preference’.

Referring to Section17(3) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, the Delhi High Court noted that while appointing a guardian, court may consider preference of a minor in case he or she is old enough to form an “intelligent preference”.

However, the bench also ruled that the provision is “couched in directory language” and the court cannot always be dictated by what the child states to be his preference. The bench said:

It is a common knowledge that where acrimony permeates in the relationship between the husband and the wife, the worst victim is the child who is directly or indirectly impacted or affected by the acrimonious relationship and is also tutored against the separated parent.

While considering the intelligent preference of such a child, not only the age of the child is material but also the surrounding circumstances of the period of separation and the reasons stated for disinclination to meet the appellant/father also assume relevance.

Introduce Concept Of Shared Parenting At Initial Stages In Marriage Disputes: Punjab HC To Govt

The High Court also noted that the child was 11-years-old until both his parents resided together. The bench observed that due to growing differences between the parents during these two years, the child has also been impacted.

The High Court added that it is not in the best interest and welfare of the child if he gets deprived of love, affection and guidance of his father, merely due to differences between his parents. The Court said:

This is more so when the parties and the child were together till about two years back. The father is not a stranger but is well known to the child having been together for eleven years.

Two years time gap cannot be considered sufficient for total alienation for the child to turn totally averse to even meet the father.

The role of mother to help forge and restore the lost/ diminished affection between the father and the child assumes greater significance.

READ ORDER | Karnataka High Court Upholds Shared Parenting Order By Family Court; Lays Down Guidelines For Non-Custodial Parents

Allowing the appeal filed by the appellant, the Delhi High Court directed that meeting be held in the court to help restore the cordiality, confidence and affection between the estranged father and the son. The order read:

We hereby direct that the child be produced to the Children’s Room in the Court Complex, Saket Courts, New Delhi on every first and third Saturday from 03:00 P.M. to 05:00 P.M. for interaction with the appellant/father.

Further, the meetings be facilitated in the Children’s Room in the presence of the Counsellor.

In case, the child is unable to come on any Saturday or it is a Court’s holiday on the said Saturday, the meeting shall be held on the next working Saturday, or the same may be compensated on any other day, subject to the convenience of both the parties.

The High Court concluded:

It is also directed that the respondent/ mother who is equally responsible to proper emotional development of the child, to make every endeavour to ensure that the child is able to restore his strained relationship with his father.

The appellant is at liberty to seek modification of this arrangement by moving appropriate application before learned Principal Judge, Family Court when sufficient rapport and comfort is established inter se him and the minor.

DO WATCH:

Hold Back Wife’s Salary Until She Hands Over Daughter’s Custody To Husband | Karnataka High Court

 

READ JUDGMENT: Delhi High Court Directs Mother To Facilitate Meeting Between Child & Father

 

 

Delhi-High-Court-Directs-Mother-To-Facilitate-Meeting-Between-Child-FatherDownload

 

LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE  (TWITTER) LINK BELOW:

Click on the link here

 

 

 

 

 

 

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Donate to Voice For Men India

If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)

Donate Now (80G Eligible)

Follow Us

Tags: #MenToochild custodydelhi high courtgender biased lawshigh court judgementsin the lawshared parenting
Team VFMI

Team VFMI

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us To Spread The Cause
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
mensdayout.com

Husband Sends Wife To NZ On Study Visa By Paying Rs 21 Lakhs | Wife Blocks His Mobile After Reaching

October 2, 2019
mensdayout.com

Daughter Takes Mum On Her Honeymoon; Months Later Mother Is Pregnant With Son-In-Law

January 20, 2020
mensdayout.com

Mumbai Shocker | 16-Year-Old Porn Addict Girl Forces Younger Brother For Sex Against His Consent; Now Pregnant

August 28, 2021
mensdayout.com

Accountant Left 24-Page Suicide Note Alleging Harassment And Infidelity By Wife

23
mensdayout.com

ASCI Upholds Complaint | CARS24 Sexist Ad To Be Modified Or Withdrawn By June 17

16
mensdayout.com

“I Curse Myself For Getting My Son Married As Per Indian Laws”: Story Of A Senior Citizen Father

15
voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025

Follow Us

Recent News

voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

January 27, 2025

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates in your inbox!

    Voice For Men

    Voice For Men India publishes articles about Men's Rights, Gender Biased Laws, Impact on Children of Separated Parents & His Story. Do check out the "Other Side.

    Follow Us

    Browse by Category

    • 498A CASES
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • BLOGS
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • GENDER STORIES
    • HIGH COURT
    • HIS STORY
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • IN THE LAW
    • IN THE NEWS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
    • MURDER
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • OTHER COURTS
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
    • SUICIDE
    • SUPREME COURT
    • Uncategorized

    Recent News

    voiceformenindia.com

    Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

    April 26, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

    April 25, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

    January 31, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    ‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

    January 27, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Delhi High Court Calls For Gender Neutrality In Domestic Violence Cases | Voice For Men India

    January 24, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Can Mother Be Accused Of Abetting Son’s Girlfriend’s Suicide If She Asked Her “To Die”: Supreme Court Responds

    January 23, 2025
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Share Your Story
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    © 2019 Voice For Men India

    No Result
    View All Result
    • HOME
    • IN THE NEWS
      • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
      • 498A CASES
      • MURDER
      • SUICIDE
      • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
      • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
      • ADULTERY
      • ALIMONY
      • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • IN THE LAW
      • HIGH COURT
      • SUPREME COURT
      • OTHER COURTS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
      • GENDER STORIES
      • BLOGS
    • HIS STORY
      • SPEAK UP MEN
      • SUCCESS STORY
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी

    © 2019 Voice For Men India