• Home
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Share Your Story
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
Voice For Men
ads
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • Donate To Us (80G Eligible)
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • Donate To Us (80G Eligible)
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
Voice For Men
No Result
View All Result
Home IN THE NEWS ADULTERY

Husband Can Be Jailed For Extra-Marital Affair Under Sec 498A | Was Adultery Decriminalised Only For Wife’s Paramour?

Team VFMI by Team VFMI
February 1, 2022
in ADULTERY, HIGH COURT, IN THE LAW, IN THE NEWS
0
mensdayout.com
Husband Can Be Jailed For Extra-Marital Affair Under Sec 498A: Madras High Court (Representation Image Only)

Husband Can Be Jailed For Extra-Marital Affair Under Sec 498A: Madras High Court (Representation Image Only)

1.7k
VIEWS

Section 497 of the IPC Adultery — part of the British-enacted penal code of 1860 — criminalised adultery, but did so “asymmetrically”: that is, only the man — and not the woman — who engaged in adultery could be punished. Moreover, only the husband could bring a prosecution for adultery; but he would have no case if he had “consented” or “connived” in the adulterous act.

In September 2018, Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was decriminalised in India (it remains a “civil offence”, that can be a ground for divorce). 

However, in its latest ruling, Madras High Court has observed that extramarital affairs can cause grave mental trauma and mental health issues leading to serious consequences in the matrimony, and that in turn, would amount to mental cruelty under Section 498(A) IPC.

Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarty however added that when deciding whether a conduct amounted to cruelty, the Court has to look at the facts and circumstances of the case.

In its order, the Bench noted that the evidence on record proves the existence of an extramarital relationship that has gone to the roots of the marriage and severely affected the mental health of the wife. This ultimately resulted in the wife leaving the matrimonial home.

Case:

The observation was made while confirming the conviction of a husband accused of engaging in an extramarital relationship with another woman while the marriage with the respondent wife was still valid.

The counsel for the petitioner/ accused had previously argued that Trial Court and the lower Appellate Court erred by considering the evidence in a perverse manner, warranting the High Court’s interference by exercising its reversional jurisdiction.

The counsel made special reference to the lower appellate court judgment that confirmed the conviction of the trial court in one sentence as a glaring example of such illegality. The counsel for the victim and the government argued that the court’s reversional powers only permit limited judicial review and the conviction by the lower courts should not be interfered with by initiating a full re-appreciation of evidence.

Trial Court

Before the trial court, the respondent wife had accused the husband, his family members and the woman alleged to have been involved in the extra marital relationship of offences under:

  • Section 406
  • Section 494
  • Section 506(ii) 
  • Section 498-A

of the IPC.

Though the wife argued that the husband contracted a second marriage and neglected the her which constitutes the offence of bigamy, it was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, the trial court convicted petitioner husband alone for the offence of mental cruelty under Section 498(A) and acquitted all others in toto with regards to all other offences.

Additionally, the counsel for the respondent wife had pointed out three angles to prove that mental cruelty was committed against her by the husband. Firstly, she submitted that she was subjected to physical and mental torture during 2000-2005 in demand of more dowry. However, the court noted that the wife herself has specifically averred that the petitioner/ accused and the respondent wife was living happily during the said period. The court said,

Ex-D1 (legal notice), is caused by the PW-1 and therefore, once she admits in the cross-examination that the notice is given on her instructions and the same being marked, it throws doubt on the allegations levelled.

The second angle relied upon by the respondent wife was a specific incident that occurred in 2012, which was later admitted by her as not happened in her cross-examination.

It was on the submission about the husband’s extra marital relationship that the court was convinced about the mental cruelty meted out to her so as to meet the requirements of Section 498(A) IPC.

Madras High Court

Relying on the dictum in K.V. Prakash Babu v. State of Karnataka, the court noted as below:

This Court has to read the evidence of PW.1, PW.7 & PW.8 as a whole and a proper reading would convey the essence that cruelty, predominantly mental cruelty, was unleashed on PW.1 (Wife), on account of the extramarital affairs developed by the petitioner herein…

But the perusal of the above dictum (K.V Prakash Babu’s case) would itself make it clear that the Court has to take into consideration the said abnormal behaviour with the facts and circumstances of the case and it has to be decided whether the conduct amounted to cruelty. Therefore, looking at the evidence of PW.1, PW.7 & PW.8, which is on record, it is clear that there was extramarital relationship.

It has caused such an effect on the mental health of PW.1, which resulted in serious domestic discord and her leaving the matrimonial home. As a matter of fact, as per the evidence on record, PW.1 went out of the matrimonial home on 16.11.2005.

 

In K.V Prakash’s case, the apex court had in November 2016 (prior to decriminalisation of adultery) held that mental cruelty cannot be given a generalised meaning and can only be ascertained based on the facts and circumstances of each case. The court had also mentioned that one out of the two opposing outcomes are probable while answering if an extramarital affair can amount to mental cruelty. In that judgement, the court had noted,

Extra marital relationship, per se, or as such would not come within the ambit of Section 498(A) of IPC. It would constitute a criminal offence. There is no denial of the fact that the cruelty need not be physical but a mental torture or abnormal behaviour that amounts to cruelty or harassment in a given case. It will depend upon the facts of the said case.

The Madras High Court further noted in K.V Prakash Babu that the husband being in an extramarital relationship and the wife having some suspicion about it won’t normally constitute mental cruelty when read in tandem with the offence of abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC (abetment to suicide).

Coming back to the case before Madras High Court, the bench also perused the birth certificate of the child born to the husband in the extramarital relationship.

During the course of the hearing of the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the first respondent, also produced the Birth certificate, evidencing the birth of a child for the petitioner/accused and the said A6, which was born on 17.09.2006 itself. Therefore, the Court cannot close its eyes to the hard evidence and the facts of this case.

The court concluded that there was no illegality committed by the trial court or the lower appellate court while convicting the accused of mental cruelty. However, the court deemed it fit to modify the sentence so as to reduce the term of imprisonment from one year to six months.

While upholding the conviction, the Madras High Court also refused to consider the petitioner’s baseless allegations levelled against the wife about her having an extra marital affair with another man. While partially allowing the criminal revision petition, the high court reiterated,

Considering all the factors cumulatively, I hold that the action of the petitioner/accused in having extramarital relationship, which has further caused grave mental trauma and affected the mental health of PW.1, leading to serious circumstances, in conjunction with the act of PW.1 being forced to leave the matrimonial home, would amount to cruelty to her within Section 498(A) of IPC.

Firstly, MDO is not promoting extra martial affairs, however, we are merely brining out how laws have been designed to give complete clean chit to women, while trapping Men with different interpretations of the IPC. 

When Adultery has been decriminalised, it should remain a civil offence and a ground for divorce as remedy to the aggrieved spouse. Let us look at the hypocrisy of our judiciary when Genders are reversed.

April 2007 – Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a married woman, Manju, to live with her lover, Suresh. Justices GS Mishra and KC Sharma the said,

It is improper to pass an order to hand over any unwilling married woman to her husband with whom she does not want to stay. The court also said that nobody should consider an adult woman as a consumer product.

Read Here: Married woman can live with her lover: court 

Jun 2021: Allahabad High Court

Division Bench of Justice Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Justice Dinesh Pathak had observed that the Woman was already married, and was in a live-in relationship with another man. Eventhough protection to such couple was denied, the court categorically stated,

We are not against the live in relation.

Read Here: We Are Not Against Live-In Relationship But Can’t Give Protection When One Of The Partners Is Married | Allahabad High Court

November 2021: Allahabad High Court

The Court noted that for certain personal reasons, the married woman/petitioner no. 1 is not residing with her husband or her in-laws. The court said,

Any such attempt from any corner either from her family members or even from police authorities will be a direct infringement and interference in her fundamental rights vested in her by the Constitution namely right to life and liberty both.

Read Here: READ ORDER | Allahabad High Court Grants Protection To Married Woman & Her Live-in Partner From Former’s Parents

December 2020 – Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench

The Nagpur bench of the Bombay high court upheld the right of a woman to be the sole nominee for the service benefits of her husband, a retired watchman from the maintenance command of the Indian Air Force. However, the court has upheld the family court order despite the fact that the woman had left behind her husband and three children and eloped with a 19-year-old man.

While rejecting an appeal jointly filed by the husband and his second wife, the bench of Justice AS Chandurkar and justice NB Suryavanshi said,

The allegations of adultery have no relevance in the present case, as the same do not in any manner affect the merits of the claim 

Read Here: Bombay High Court Upholds Nomination For Legally Wedded Wife Who Is Living In Adultery Since 1989

December 2021: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court in a maintenance case ruled,

The issue as to whether the respondent is living in adultery or not can be decided only after evidence is lead by both the parties. At the time of fixing interim maintenance this Court is not inclined to go into this question at this juncture.

Read Here: READ ORDER | Issue Of Adultery To Be Decided Later, Not During Grant Of Interim Maintenance To Wife: Delhi High Court

Leave Your Thoughts On Madras High Court Conviction For The Husband In The Tweet Below:

Husband Can Be Jailed For Extra-Marital Affair Under #498A | Was Adultery Decriminalised Only For Wives?

▪️We list 5 cases randomly where Wives have been allowed to live in Adultery by Court
▪️All details inside article & thread below#GenderBiasedLawshttps://t.co/VKvUnaU2cK

— Men’s Day Out (@MensDayOutIndia) February 1, 2022

ALSO READ-

Husband Can’t Use Wife’s “Private” Abortion Report To Prove Adultery: Dharwad Bench of Karnataka High Court

Woman’s Lover Dies In Jaipur After Jumping From 5th Floor To Escape Her Husband

Vadodara Woman Elopes With Lover Taking Along Twin Sons | Husband Alleges No Action From Police To Trace Her, His Children

Man Ends Life After Wife Allegedly Shows Her Intimate Pictures With Boyfriend, & Humiliation From In-Laws

Ahmedabad Woman Dials Mahila Helpline After Both Husband & Lover Refuse To Take Her Back

Two Contrasting Orders On Live-in Relationship Between Married Woman & Partner | One Faces Bigamy; Other Protection

ALSO WATCH-

Women Want Gender Equality…..& Reserved Seats | Equality Must Be Equal

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Donate to Voice For Men India

Blogging about Equal Rights for Men or writing about Gender Biased Laws is often looked upon as controversial, as many 'perceive' it Anti-Women. Due to this grey area - where we demand Equality in the true sense for all genders - most brands distance themselves from advertising on a portal like ours.

We, therefore, look forward to your support as donors who understand our work and are willing to partner in this endeavour to spread this cause. Do support our work to counter one sided gender biased narratives in the media.

Donate Now (80G Eligible)

To make an instant donation, click on the "Donate Now" button above. For information regarding donation via Bank Transfer, click here.

Follow Us

Tags: adulterygender biased lawshigh court judgementsin the lawMadras High Court
Team VFMI

Team VFMI

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us To Spread The Cause
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
mensdayout.com

Husband Sends Wife To NZ On Study Visa By Paying Rs 21 Lakhs | Wife Blocks His Mobile After Reaching

October 2, 2019
mensdayout.com

Humans Of Bombay Post One-Sided Sob Story By Wife; Here’s What Brother Of Deceased Husband Has To Say

June 8, 2020
mensdayout.com

Bengaluru Woman Alleged Assault | Zomato Delivery Man Shares His Side Of Story

March 11, 2021
mensdayout.com

Daughter Takes Mum On Her Honeymoon; Months Later Mother Is Pregnant With Son-In-Law

January 20, 2020
mensdayout.com

Accountant Left 24-Page Suicide Note Alleging Harassment And Infidelity By Wife

23
mensdayout.com

ASCI Upholds Complaint | CARS24 Sexist Ad To Be Modified Or Withdrawn By June 17

16
mensdayout.com

“I Curse Myself For Getting My Son Married As Per Indian Laws”: Story Of A Senior Citizen Father

15
mensdayout.com

Greta Thunberg – Zero Solutions – Nominated For Nobel Prize | Boyan Slat – Ocean Cleanup Project Goes Unnoticed

12
voiceformenindia.com

Wife Beats Me & My Old Father, Gives Threats Of Police Complaints, Has Extra-Marital Affair: Husbands Approach Jansunwai In Prayagraj Seeking Help

June 27, 2022
voiceformenindia.com

Domestic Abuse Of Men | Pune Court Orders 78-Year-Old Wife To Pay Interim Maintenance To 83-Year-Old Husband

June 27, 2022
voiceformenindia.com

Egypt Gets First Association To Defend Rights Of Men & Children To Preserve The Entity Of Family

June 25, 2022
voiceformenindia.com

Shared Parenting | Bickering Among Couples Affects Kids Tremendously & Unhappy Childhood Is Dangerous: Former Calcutta High Court Judge

June 25, 2022

Follow Us

Recent News

voiceformenindia.com

Wife Beats Me & My Old Father, Gives Threats Of Police Complaints, Has Extra-Marital Affair: Husbands Approach Jansunwai In Prayagraj Seeking Help

June 27, 2022
voiceformenindia.com

Domestic Abuse Of Men | Pune Court Orders 78-Year-Old Wife To Pay Interim Maintenance To 83-Year-Old Husband

June 27, 2022
voiceformenindia.com

Egypt Gets First Association To Defend Rights Of Men & Children To Preserve The Entity Of Family

June 25, 2022
voiceformenindia.com

Shared Parenting | Bickering Among Couples Affects Kids Tremendously & Unhappy Childhood Is Dangerous: Former Calcutta High Court Judge

June 25, 2022

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates in your inbox!

    Voice For Men

    Voice For Men India publishes articles about Men's Rights, Gender Biased Laws, Impact on Children of Separated Parents & His Story. Do check out the "Other Side.

    Follow Us

    Browse by Category

    • 498A CASES
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • BLOGS
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • GENDER STORIES
    • HIGH COURT
    • HIS STORY
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • IN THE LAW
    • IN THE NEWS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
    • MURDER
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • OTHER COURTS
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
    • SUICIDE
    • SUPREME COURT
    • Uncategorized

    Recent News

    voiceformenindia.com

    Wife Beats Me & My Old Father, Gives Threats Of Police Complaints, Has Extra-Marital Affair: Husbands Approach Jansunwai In Prayagraj Seeking Help

    June 27, 2022
    voiceformenindia.com

    Domestic Abuse Of Men | Pune Court Orders 78-Year-Old Wife To Pay Interim Maintenance To 83-Year-Old Husband

    June 27, 2022
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Share Your Story
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    © 2019 Voice For Men India

    No Result
    View All Result
    • HOME
    • IN THE NEWS
      • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
      • 498A CASES
      • MURDER
      • SUICIDE
      • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
      • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
      • ADULTERY
      • ALIMONY
      • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • IN THE LAW
      • HIGH COURT
      • SUPREME COURT
      • OTHER COURTS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
      • GENDER STORIES
      • BLOGS
    • HIS STORY
      • SPEAK UP MEN
      • SUCCESS STORY
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • Donate To Us (80G Eligible)
    • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी

    © 2019 Voice For Men India