The Delhi High Court in its recent order observed that the mere fact that recovery of Stridhan is to be made from a person, cannot be the sole ground for arresting him for offences under Sections 498-A (related to dowry demand) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the IPC.
Justice Subramonium Prasad observed that in such cases, police are empowered under CrPC to conduct searches of premises of the accused. The court said,
Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is being sought only for recovery of stridhan. The recovery of stridhan alone cannot be a reason to deny anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. The police are vested with sufficient powers under the Cr.P.C to conduct searches of premises.
Case:
A Complaint was filed by the petitioner in 2018, levelling allegations against his wife and her family members. It was alleged that his wife was not happy with her marriage and used to abuse him. He also stated that he was threatened of dire consequences by his wife’s father who works as an officer in Delhi Police Department.
Allegations by Wife
The woman claimed that her petitioner-husband, her mother-in-law and both her sisters-in-law had insulted, beaten, pressurised, harassed and tortured her for more dowry and threatened that if she wanted a peaceful life, her father must further arrange a dowry amount of Rs 50 lakh.
She further alleged that the petitioner had forcibly taken her stridhan and given it to his mother. It was also stated that in 2017, the petitioner fought with the complainant and threw her out of the house and that her passport, ID and clothes was also with him.
Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court noted,
The petitioner is accused of offence under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC. The perusal of the status report shows that the custodial interrogation of the Petitioner is being sought only for recovery of stridhan. The recovery of stridhan alone cannot be a reason to deny anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Thus, the high court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the FIR registered by his wife.
The court also added that there was nothing on record to show that the petitioner and his family were in such a position that they would be able to threaten the witnesses. The court said,
It is trite law that the Police Officer before arresting the accused who is accused of offence which is punishable with imprisonment for a period of seven years has to be satisfied that such arrest is necessary to prevent a person from committing any further offence; or for proper investigation of the case; or to prevent the accused from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear; or tampering with such evidence in any manner; or to prevent such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to a witness so as to dissuade him by disclosing such facts to the Courts or the Police Officer; or unless such accused person is arrested, his presence in the court whenever required cannot be ensured.
Furthermore, it was observed that there are cross-complaints in the matter and thus pre-arrest bail plea of the husband was accordingly allowed.
ALSO READ –
READ JUDGEMENT | Presents Given To Bride By Parents Without Demand From Groom Is Not Dowry: Kerala High Court
READ ORDER | Wife Filed False Dowry Case After Learning That Husband Is Going To Marry Another Lady: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kerala High Court | Wedding Picture Cannot Be Proof Of Gold Given As Dowry
Delhi Woman Hacks Husband’s Social Media Account & Sends Fake Dowry Harassment Messages To Herself
UP Man Spends 13-Months In Jail On False Kidnapping, Dowry Harassment Charges | Wife Found Living With Lover
Gujarat High Court Issues Notice To Bank Over Appeal By Estranged Husband To Access Locker
ALSO WATCH –
National Family Health Survey | 1020 Females Per 1000 Males | Where Are The Missing Men?
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)