Wife Cannot File Domestic Violence Complaint At A Place She Is Merely Visiting | Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal

The Bombay High Court in its recent order ruled that a woman cannot file a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act at a place where she is merely “visiting” and the same is not her “permanent / temporary place of residence”.

The high court upheld the order of city magistrate which refused to entertain the complaint of a Hyderabad-based woman citing lack of jurisdiction.

Case:

According to the woman, she married in December 1993 in Hyderabad. She alleged that she was subjected to physical and mental torture by her husband and son for which she had filed a complaint with the local police on September 4 this year. Finally, she left her house on September 26-27 and came to Mumbai, where she was to meet her brother, who resides in the US. She was staying in a hotel in Bandra.

In October, she filed two complaints with the police saying that she was being followed and was under surveillance on her husband and son’s instructions.

On October 28, she filed a complaint with the magistrate, which is within 23-days of her arrival in Mumbai.

Her counsel Rizwan Merchant argued that the complainant’s husband and son were very influential persons in Hyderabad and she suspects that no action would be taken against them by the local police.

Bombay High Court

The high court was hearing an appeal filed by the woman against the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate at Bandra which dismissed her complaint under the DV Act.

Justice SK Shinde observed that if a woman was allowed to file complaints at any places she merely visits, then…

It may lead to abuse of legal process of law, as aggrieved person may choose, any place, where she may be a casual visitor.

Section 27 of the DV Act permits filing a complaint where the woman “permanently” or “temporarily resides”. Setting out the difference between temporary residence and causal visit place, the HC has said,

A place, where aggrieved person has gone on a casual visit, a lodge or hostel or a guest house or an inn where she stays for a short period or a residence at a place simply for the purpose of filing a case against another person cannot be a place which would satisfy the term ‘temporarily resides’ as appears in Section 27.

The high court noted that the woman had not taken any steps to protect her life, property or restrain her husband from inflicting domestic violence against her since her marriage in 1993. The judge questioned,

In the backdrop of these facts, it is to be ascertained, whether application filed (under the DV Act) by the Petitioner (woman) discloses or implies her intention to reside at a place in Mumbai or was it just casual or flying visit to acquire jurisdiction.

The high court also noted,

Averments in application suggest, that Applicant is well educated person; she is financially sound; her parents are in business. In consideration of her background it is difficult to accept her contention or that she could not seek protection order at Hyderabad.

Remarking further, the high court judge said that there is no suggestion to imply that she was forced to leave Hyderabad and that she intends to reside in Mumbai. While dismissing the woman’s appeal, Bombay High Court concluded,

On the contrary the chronology of the events do suggest, that the Applicant engineered the cause of action with an intention to file case and confer jurisdiction upon the Magistrate (in Mumbai).

ALSO READ –

READ ORDER | Bombay HC Orders Eviction Of Daughter From 94-Year-Old Father’s Home Citing Harassment For Property

Bombay High Court Orders Mumbai Commissioner Of Police To Clear Maintenance Arrears To His Estranged Wife

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Man “Falsely” Accused By Divorced Wife Of Sexually Exploiting Minor Son

Bombay High Court Grants Divorce To Husband After Estranged Wife Uploads “Awaiting Divorce” As Profile Status On Matrimonial Websites

Divorced Wife Files Domestic Violence Case On Former Husband & In-Laws After His Re-Marriage | HC Calls It Abuse Of Law

READ ORDER | Wife Cannot Simply Invoke Domestic Violence Act To Claim Maintenance

ALSO WATCH –

Ashwini Upadhyay Wants Computerized Calculation For Maintenance To Women | Who Will Check Perjury?

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below