• Home
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Share Your Story
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
Voice For Men
ads
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
Voice For Men
No Result
View All Result
Home IN THE LAW HIGH COURT

READ ORDER | Purpose Of Parental Alienation Is To Damage Child’s Relationship With Other Parent

Team VFMI by Team VFMI
May 26, 2021
in HIGH COURT, IMPACT ON CHILDREN, IN THE LAW, IN THE NEWS
0
mensdayout.com
आर्डर पढ़ें | पिता से बच्चे के अलगाव का उद्देश्य पिता के साथ बच्चे के रिश्ते को नुकसान पहुंचाना और मानसिक क्रूरता है

आर्डर पढ़ें | पिता से बच्चे के अलगाव का उद्देश्य पिता के साथ बच्चे के रिश्ते को नुकसान पहुंचाना और मानसिक क्रूरता है

605
VIEWS

In its recent order dated May 18, 2021, the Kerala High Court ruled that any act by a parent that resulted in a denial of a child’s love and affection to the other parent by alienating the child amounts to ‘mental cruelty’.

While deciding a matrimonial appeal filed by a husband accusing his wife of cruelty, Justices A Muhamed Mustaque and Dr Kauser Edappagath said,

Nothing can be more painful than experiencing one’s children—one’s own flesh and blood—rejecting him/her. The above acts of the respondent willfully alienating the child from the appellant, no doubt, constitute mental cruelty…

Case:

Couple got married in 2009 as per the Hindu Marriage Act. However, soon they witnessed regular instances of outrage and resentment, causing the appellant serious mental agony and pain, the husband argued. A daughter was born to them after two years of marriage.

Allegations by Husband/Father 

The appellant-husband submitted that he was told about the delivery of his own child through family friends. He informed the high court, that though he rushed to the hospital, he was not permitted to see the child and was obstructed from entering the hospital by the relatives of the wife.

He further went on to argue that he and his parents were completely isolated from the child and the wife even refused to send him a photo of his daughter. It was asserted, that only after the District Legal Services Authority intervened was he able to meet child. Husband’s counsel said,

The respondent intentionally alienated the child from the appellant depriving his parental right to be loved by the child. It amounts to nothing but mental cruelty.

Kerala High Court

The appellant had filed for divorce on the ground of cruelty. His earlier petition was dismissed by the Family Court in Thrissur. The High Court made the below pronouncement while allowing an appeal filed by a husband against his wife.

The Bench ruled that parents had a right to receive the love and affection of a child. Finding force in the argument raised by the appellant, the court emphasized that physical violence is not absolutely essential to constitute cruelty.

As reported by Livelaw, the Court explained,

A child has the right to the love and affection of both parents. Similarly, the parents have the right to receive the love and affection of the child. Any act on the part of the one parent calculated to deny the love and affection of the child to the other parent by alienating the child from him/her amounts to mental cruelty.

Going through the facts on record, the Court pointed out that the appellant had suffered cruelty at the hands of the wife, both physical and mental and found nothing to discredit the appellant’s testimony that his wife constantly showered abuse and filthy language and even went as far as to physically assault his parents. Adding to this was the fact of parental alienation.

Comments on Parental Alienation

Kerala High Court said,

Parental Alienation is a process through which a child becomes estranged from a parent as the result of the psychological manipulation of another parent. It occurs when one parent undermines or prejudices the contact and relationship between the child and the other parent without well-founded reasons.

It is a strategy whereby one parent intentionally displays to the child unjustified negativity aimed at the other parent. The purpose of this strategy is to damage the child’s relationship with the other parent and to turn the child’s emotions against the other parent.

Applying the preponderance of probabilities principle, the Court concluded that the appellant had suffered mental cruelty at the instance of his wife. Therefore, his application for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty was accepted by the Court.

‘Mental Cruelty Described By High Court

The Court laid down the following principles to explain mental cruelty:

  • The conduct complained of need not necessarily be so grave and severe so as to make cohabitation virtually unendurable or of such character as to cause danger to life, limb or health
  • Must be something more serious than “ordinary wear and tear of the married life”
  • The conduct and behaviour of one spouse should be such that it causes reasonable apprehension in the mind of the latter that it is not safe for him or her to continue the marital tie
  • The feeling of deep anguish, disappointment, frustration and embarrassment in one spouse caused by the sustained course of abusive and humiliating conduct of other may sometimes lead to mental cruelty
  • Mental cruelty may also consist of verbal abuses and insults by using filthy and abusive language leading to constant disturbance of mental peace of the other party. Malevolent intention is not essential to cruelty, if by ordinary sense in human affairs, the act complained of could otherwise be regarded as cruelty

On whether the cruelty was condoned in any way in terms of Section 23 of the Hindu Marriage Act:

The Court pointed out that the Family Court had rejected the appellant’s plea for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act citing Section 23(1)(b). The Section disallows a divorce to be decreed if the petitioner condoned the cruelty in any manner. The high court suggested,

The term ‘condonation’ had not been elaborated, and would imply wiping of all rights of injured spouse to take matrimonial proceedings.

The court ruled,

In a sense, condonation is reconciliation, namely, the intention to remit the wrong and restore the offending spouse to the original status which in every case deserves to be gathered from the attending circumstances.

Relying on the Supreme Court’s dictum in NG Dastane and other cases, the Court elaborated,

Condonation of matrimonial offence deprives the condoning spouse of the right of seeking relief on the offending conduct. However, condonation cannot be taken to be an absolute and unconditional forgiveness.

Therefore, in case the matrimonial offence is repeated even after an act of condonation on the part of the spouse, it gets revived on the commission of subsequent act resulting in matrimonial disharmony. Past acts of cruelty even after condonation are grounds to seek divorce if revived by later acts of cruelty.

From the facts, the Court noted there was nothing on record that demonstrated that there was forgiveness and restoration between the parties or that the appellant had condoned of the respondent’s cruelty. The lower court’s rejection of the petition citing Section 23 was not legally sustainable, the High Court concluded.

On these terms, the appeal was allowed.

CLICK ON THE LINK TO READ FULL ORDER

ALSO READ –

http://voiceformenindia.com/in-the-news/495separated-fathers-urge-smriti-irani-to-amend-unfair-women-biased-laws-in-child-custody-cases88/

http://voiceformenindia.com/in-the-law/give-allowance-till-son-gets-his-first-degree-not-just-till-hes-18-supreme-court/

http://voiceformenindia.com/in-the-news/child-custody-india-lockdown/

Join us on our Telegram & Facebook Group

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Donate to Voice For Men India

If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)

Donate Now (80G Eligible)

Follow Us

Tags: child custodyfather storyimpact on childrenin the lawkeralakerala high courtshared parenting
Team VFMI

Team VFMI

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us To Spread The Cause
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
mensdayout.com

Husband Sends Wife To NZ On Study Visa By Paying Rs 21 Lakhs | Wife Blocks His Mobile After Reaching

October 2, 2019
mensdayout.com

Daughter Takes Mum On Her Honeymoon; Months Later Mother Is Pregnant With Son-In-Law

January 20, 2020
mensdayout.com

Mumbai Shocker | 16-Year-Old Porn Addict Girl Forces Younger Brother For Sex Against His Consent; Now Pregnant

August 28, 2021
mensdayout.com

Accountant Left 24-Page Suicide Note Alleging Harassment And Infidelity By Wife

23
mensdayout.com

ASCI Upholds Complaint | CARS24 Sexist Ad To Be Modified Or Withdrawn By June 17

16
mensdayout.com

“I Curse Myself For Getting My Son Married As Per Indian Laws”: Story Of A Senior Citizen Father

15
voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025

Follow Us

Recent News

voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

January 27, 2025

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates in your inbox!

    Voice For Men

    Voice For Men India publishes articles about Men's Rights, Gender Biased Laws, Impact on Children of Separated Parents & His Story. Do check out the "Other Side.

    Follow Us

    Browse by Category

    • 498A CASES
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • BLOGS
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • GENDER STORIES
    • HIGH COURT
    • HIS STORY
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • IN THE LAW
    • IN THE NEWS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
    • MURDER
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • OTHER COURTS
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
    • SUICIDE
    • SUPREME COURT
    • Uncategorized

    Recent News

    voiceformenindia.com

    Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

    April 26, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

    April 25, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

    January 31, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    ‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

    January 27, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Delhi High Court Calls For Gender Neutrality In Domestic Violence Cases | Voice For Men India

    January 24, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Can Mother Be Accused Of Abetting Son’s Girlfriend’s Suicide If She Asked Her “To Die”: Supreme Court Responds

    January 23, 2025
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Share Your Story
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    © 2019 Voice For Men India

    No Result
    View All Result
    • HOME
    • IN THE NEWS
      • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
      • 498A CASES
      • MURDER
      • SUICIDE
      • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
      • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
      • ADULTERY
      • ALIMONY
      • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • IN THE LAW
      • HIGH COURT
      • SUPREME COURT
      • OTHER COURTS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
      • GENDER STORIES
      • BLOGS
    • HIS STORY
      • SPEAK UP MEN
      • SUCCESS STORY
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी

    © 2019 Voice For Men India