• Home
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Share Your Story
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
Voice For Men
ads
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
Voice For Men
No Result
View All Result
Home IN THE SOCIAL GENDER STORIES

Assisted Reproductive Technology Act & Surrogacy Act | Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Bias Against Single Men

Admin by Admin
May 27, 2022
in GENDER STORIES, HIGH COURT, IN THE LAW, IN THE SOCIAL
0
voiceformenindia.com
Assisted Reproductive Technology Act & Surrogacy Act | Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Bias Against Single Men (Representation Image Only)

Assisted Reproductive Technology Act & Surrogacy Act | Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Bias Against Single Men (Representation Image Only)

499
VIEWS

A plea has been filed in the Delhi High Court challenging the vires of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, stating that some of the provisions are discriminatory against a single man desirous of being a father through surrogacy and a married woman who already has a child and is desirous of expanding her family through the means of surrogacy.

The Delhi High Court on Friday issued notice on this plea challenging the vires of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, reported Livelaw.

The plea KARAN BALRAJ MEHTA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA states that some of the provisions of the Acts are discriminatory against a single man desirous of being a father through surrogacy and a married woman who already has a child and is desirous of expanding her family through the means of surrogacy.

A division bench comprising of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Sachin Datta sought response of the Centre while granting six weeks time for filing of the counter affidavit in the matter. Justice Sanghi orally remarked,

This requires consideration. 

The matter will now be heard on November 9.

Plea

The plea has been moved by Advocate Aditya Samaddar on behalf of the petitioner, that argues argues how the impugned Acts are ultra vires Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The plea has been filed by two individuals, a single unmarried man and a married woman. Karan Bajaj Mehta, the first petitioner and an advocate by profession, states that he is desirous of being a father by means of surrogacy.

Whereas the second petitioner, a psychology teacher states that her marriage had subsisted since the year 2014 and she became a mother last year, however, she is desirous of having another child but only through surrogacy.

Further, stating that the choice of reproduction has been held to be a part of the right to life under Article 21 by the Supreme Court, the plea avers that the said choices also fall within the right to privacy and that the Impugned Acts severely regulate these rights, so much so, that both the fundamental rights stand defeated of the petitioners.

The plea thus challenges sec. 2(e), 14(2), 21, 27(3) and 31(1) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 as well as sec. 2(h), 2(s), 2(r), 2(zd),2(zg), 4(ii)(a), 4(ii)(b) and 4(iii), 4(II)(C), 8 and Section 38(1)(a) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 as being ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The plea states,

Because the ban on commercial surrogacy, seemingly enacted to protect impoverished women, de-nudes such women from their right over their bodies and denies them the opportunity to exercise agency over their divine right of giving birth.

The plea further argues that the personal decision of a single person about the birth of a baby through surrogacy, i.e., the right of reproductive autonomy is a facet of the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21. It added,

Thus, the right of privacy of every citizen or person to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters fundamentally affecting a decision to bear or beget a child through surrogacy cannot be taken away.

In the simplest of terms, the right to commission surrogacy, to found a family, to procreate is a personal decision which cannot and should not have government intrusion in a democratic society.

Background:

The Parliament on December 8, 2021 passed the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, which received the assent of the President on December 18, 2021. The Act aims at the regulation and supervision of ART clinics and assisted reproductive technology banks, prevention of misuse, and safe and ethical practice of ART services.

The Act excludes unmarried men, divorced men, widowed men, unmarried yet cohabiting heterosexual couples, trans persons and homosexual couples (whether married or cohabiting) from availing ART services. This exclusion is relevant as the Surrogacy Act also excludes above said persons from taking recourse to surrogacy as a method of reproduction. Right alongside this Act comes the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, which only recognises altruistic surrogacy as legal.

RELATED STORY –

Assisted Reproductive Tech Bill 2020 | Opposition Flags Exclusion Of Single Men, LGBTQ People

ALSO WATCH – 

Interview With Aditya Tiwari | India’s First Youngest Single Father

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Donate to Voice For Men India

If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)

Donate Now (80G Eligible)

Follow Us

Tags: delhi high courtgender biased lawsgender biased mediagender equalityin the lawspeak up menvoice for men
Admin

Admin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us To Spread The Cause
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
mensdayout.com

Husband Sends Wife To NZ On Study Visa By Paying Rs 21 Lakhs | Wife Blocks His Mobile After Reaching

October 2, 2019
mensdayout.com

Daughter Takes Mum On Her Honeymoon; Months Later Mother Is Pregnant With Son-In-Law

January 20, 2020
mensdayout.com

Mumbai Shocker | 16-Year-Old Porn Addict Girl Forces Younger Brother For Sex Against His Consent; Now Pregnant

August 28, 2021
mensdayout.com

Accountant Left 24-Page Suicide Note Alleging Harassment And Infidelity By Wife

23
mensdayout.com

ASCI Upholds Complaint | CARS24 Sexist Ad To Be Modified Or Withdrawn By June 17

16
mensdayout.com

“I Curse Myself For Getting My Son Married As Per Indian Laws”: Story Of A Senior Citizen Father

15
voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025

Follow Us

Recent News

voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

January 27, 2025

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates in your inbox!

    Voice For Men

    Voice For Men India publishes articles about Men's Rights, Gender Biased Laws, Impact on Children of Separated Parents & His Story. Do check out the "Other Side.

    Follow Us

    Browse by Category

    • 498A CASES
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • BLOGS
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • GENDER STORIES
    • HIGH COURT
    • HIS STORY
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • IN THE LAW
    • IN THE NEWS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
    • MURDER
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • OTHER COURTS
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
    • SUICIDE
    • SUPREME COURT
    • Uncategorized

    Recent News

    voiceformenindia.com

    Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

    April 26, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

    April 25, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

    January 31, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    ‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

    January 27, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Delhi High Court Calls For Gender Neutrality In Domestic Violence Cases | Voice For Men India

    January 24, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Can Mother Be Accused Of Abetting Son’s Girlfriend’s Suicide If She Asked Her “To Die”: Supreme Court Responds

    January 23, 2025
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Share Your Story
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    © 2019 Voice For Men India

    No Result
    View All Result
    • HOME
    • IN THE NEWS
      • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
      • 498A CASES
      • MURDER
      • SUICIDE
      • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
      • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
      • ADULTERY
      • ALIMONY
      • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • IN THE LAW
      • HIGH COURT
      • SUPREME COURT
      • OTHER COURTS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
      • GENDER STORIES
      • BLOGS
    • HIS STORY
      • SPEAK UP MEN
      • SUCCESS STORY
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी

    © 2019 Voice For Men India