READ ORDER | Mother-in-Law Being Owner Of Property, Can Evict Troublesome Daughter-in-Law From Shared Matrimonial Household: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has observed that a mother-in-law – being the owner of the property – is not barred from claiming eviction against her daughter-in-law where the residence is a shared household.

Justice Asha Menon observed,

Where a residence is clearly a shared household, it does not bar the owner, the plaintiff herein, from claiming eviction against her daughter-in-law, if the circumstances call for it.

The Bench thus granted a decree of possession in favour of a mother-in-law and against the daughter-in-law and her mother, while granting them three months time to vacate the premises. 

Case:

The daughter-in-law had come into the suit premises after her marriage in August 2014. The son of the plaintiff passed away in September 2020.

Subsequently, a case arose out of a civil suit seeking possession, damages and permanent injunction with regards to a property wherein the mother-in-law claimed to be the exclusive and absolute owner of the property.

Thus, this suit was filed by the mother-in-law against the daughter-in-law and her mother. 

Delhi High Court

The Court was of the view that the defendant no. 2 had no right to either question the title of the mother in law, or assert the right to residence in the suit premises as she had no such rights to remain in the premises.

On the issue of title of the property, the Court noted that the daughter-in-law had made two conflicting statements:

(i) that the mother in law executed a will bequeathing her property, and

(ii) that the mother in law had only a life interest in the suit property

The court noted,

Here, the defendants have admitted to the existence of the Relinquishment Deed and the Conveyance Deed executed in favour of the plaintiff. Merely raising the bogey of a life interest does not detract from the admissions made, thus acknowledging the exclusive title of the plaintiff to the suit property.

The documents as noticed have never been challenged and the raising of pleas that are untenable leading to a fruitless enquiry in trial should be avoided.

Shared Matrimonial Household

It was also the case of the defendants that as the suit property was shared household of the daughter-in-law, the suit itself could not be instituted. However, the plaintiff had argued that according to the judgment of the Supreme Court, a civil suit for possession is in consonance with the provisions of sec. 17 of the Domestic Violence Act.

The Court therefore reiterated that the mere fact that premises take on the nature of shared household would not per se be a complete defence to a suit for possession filed by the owner of the property, being the in-laws of the aggrieved person, nor is such a suit barred. The court observed thus,

The protection under the DV Act assuring the residence of the aggrieved person in the shared household does not vest any proprietary or indefeasible right on the aggrieved person.

Adding further, the Delhi High Court said,

Nor does the right of residence allowed to aggrieved person extend to her insisting on the right of residence in a particular premises. Section 19 of the DV Act provides for an alternate accommodation being given to the aggrieved person of the same level in certain circumstances.

Thus, it is clear that even where a residence is clearly a shared household, it does not bar the owner, the plaintiff herein, from claiming eviction against her daughter-in-law, if the circumstances call for it.

Mother & Sister of Daughter-in-Law Claiming Rights Too

The Court added that by inducting her mother as well as her sister, the daughter-in-law had made an attempt to assert rights in respect of the suit property, clearly causing distress to the mother in law. The court remarked,

In view of the clear facts and circumstances, the plaintiff is clearly entitled to seek possession of the suit premises from the two defendants without the rigours of an unnecessary and prolonged trial at her age.

Accordingly, disposing of the matter, the Court ordered thus,

The defendants are granted three months time to vacate the premises, subject to Covid-19 conditions, in which event, they can move the court for further time to vacate.

ALSO READ –

READ ORDER | Senior Citizen Has Right To Reside In His Own House; Son & Daughter-in-Law Are Licensees At Best

Elderly In-Laws Cannot Use Senior Citizen Act To Evict Daughter-in-Law From Home

READ ORDER | Bombay HC Orders Eviction Of Daughter From 94-Year-Old Father’s Home Citing Harassment For Property

Son Cannot Invoke Domestic Violence Act To Claim Father’s Property On Strength Of Wife’s Right To Residence

Watch Video | Woman Thrashes 80-Year-Old Mother-in-Law & Throws Her Out Of Home

ALSO WATCH – 

Should Daughter-in-Law Be Allowed In Matrimonial Home After DV On In-Laws?

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below