• Home
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Share Your Story
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
Voice For Men
ads
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • IN THE NEWS
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • 498A CASES
    • MURDER
    • SUICIDE
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • IN THE LAW
    • HIGH COURT
    • SUPREME COURT
    • OTHER COURTS
  • IN THE SOCIAL
    • GENDER STORIES
    • BLOGS
  • HIS STORY
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
  • NON TIER-I CITIES
  • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी
No Result
View All Result
Voice For Men
No Result
View All Result
Home IN THE LAW HIGH COURT

Son Cannot Invoke Domestic Violence Act To Claim Father’s Property On Strength Of Wife’s Right To Residence

Team VFMI by Team VFMI
August 25, 2021
in HIGH COURT, IN THE LAW
0
mensdayout.com
Delhi High Court Stays Family Court Order Granting Daily 2-Hour Visitation Right To Putative Father (Representation Image Only)

Delhi High Court Stays Family Court Order Granting Daily 2-Hour Visitation Right To Putative Father (Representation Image Only)

755
VIEWS

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday held that the provisions of Domestic Violence Act, being a social welfare legislation, cannot be used by a son as a ploy to either claim a right in his father’s property or to retain possession of the same on the strength of his wife’s right of residence. The matter pertained to a property dispute between a Father Vs his son and his wife, where the daughter-in-law invoked Domestic Violence Act to retain her husband’s share in the property. 

Justice Pratibha Singh observed,

The provisions of the DV Act cannot be used as a ploy by the son, to either claim a right in his father’s property or continue to retain possession of the father’s property, on the strength of his wife’s right of residence.

Case:

The father had filed a suit against his son and daughter-in-law seeking decree of permanent injunction against them thereby restraining them from disposing-off the suit property.

It was thus the case of the father, that he being the owner of property, permanent injunction was sought in view of various disputes between him and the defendants being his son and daughter-in-law.

Arguments By Defendants (Son & His Wife)

On the other hand, it was the case of the defendants that the property in question was purchased from the joint family fund and that it was generated out of the sale of the earlier property, to which he (son) had a right, something which does not exclusively belong to the father.

Arguments By Plaintiff (Father)

The contention of the defendants that they cannot be removed from the house/suit property because the suit property is the shared house-hold and as members of the joint family property is not tenable as defendant no.2 (daughter-in-law) can claim her rights from her husband i.e. defendant no.1 only and not from her father-in-law/plaintiff, who has no duty to provide residence to either son or daughter-in-law. The reference may also be held to the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in S. R. Batra and Anr. vs. Smt. Taruna Batra. 1(2007) SLTl.

Trial Court

The Trial Court had held that the plaintiff father was the exclusive owner of the said property and the son and daughter-in-law i.e., the defendants were merely licensees. Accordingly, a decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff in his application under Order 12 Rule 6 of CPC.

The First Appellate Court confirmed the findings of the Trial Court. The same was challenged by way of a second appeal in the High Court by the son and daughter-in-law.

Delhi High Court

Going through the facts on record, Justice Pratibha Singh said,

A civil dispute relating to ownership of property cannot be converted, in this manner, into a case under the DV Act, as the same would amount to be an abuse of the beneficial provisions of the DV Act, by stretching it over and beyond its purpose and ambit.

Analysing the facts of the case and relying on plethora of judgments on the subject, the Court was of the view that the father was not in a good financial condition, and in fact was required to avail of legal-aid, to be able to pursue the suit before the Trial Court. The high court thus remarked,
 

These pleas are very generalised in nature, and clearly appear to be pleas which are taken to highlight the domestic problem within the family members rather than to set up a case under the DV Act.

Admittedly, there are no complaints that have been preferred against the father-in-law and there are no cases filed or pending under the DV Act, or any other legislation at the instance of the daughter-in-law.

The high court further said that “remote allegations against the brother i.e., the devar, in the written statement, would not result in a finding of ‘shared household’, where the daughter-in-law, by herself, would have to be given a right of residence. The court observed,

While the DV Act is a social welfare legislation granting protection to women who are victims of domestic violence, every dispute amongst family members cannot be converted into a dispute under the DV Act. The same ought not to be allowed to happen, as it may cause unintended misuse of the provisions of the said Act creating turmoil within families, especially when there is no matrimonial dispute whatsoever between husband and the wife, i.e., son and daughter-in-law,” the Court observed at the outset.

Concluding the matter the high court also said,

There is no complaint of Domestic Violence raised by the daughter-in-law before any forum. In fact, to the contrary, the Plaintiff has filed complaints against his son and daughter-in-law with police repeatedly, alleging ill-treatment and abuse.

The court also said that the following peculiar facts arising in this case, deserve to be highlighted:

  1. The ownership of the Plaintiff in the suit property is not in dispute
  2. The sale of the property of the mother, which took place in 2011, was never challenged by the Defendants
  3. The purchase of this suit property in the name of the Plaintiff was never challenged by the Defendants
  4. There is no complaint of Domestic Violence raised by the daughter-in-law before any forum. In fact, to the contrary, the Plaintiff has filed complaints against his son and daughter-in-law with police repeatedly, alleging ill-treatment and abuse
  5. The Defendants i.e., the son and daughter-in-law are living together peacefully. The written statement before the trial court was filed jointly. The first appeal was also filed jointly, and so is the present second appeal. There is no estrangement or marital discord between them
  6. The order passed in the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC has also been executed and the Defendants have already moved out of the suit property and are living in alternate premises

 

Accordingly, the Court dismissed the appeal by observing that the judgments of the Trial Court and the first Appellate Court do not warrant interference.

CLICK ON THE LINK TO READ FULL ORDERDownload

ALSO READ –

READ ORDER | Senior Citizen Has Right To Reside In His Own House; Son & Daughter-in-Law Are Licensees At Best

Elderly In-Laws Cannot Use Senior Citizen Act To Evict Daughter-in-Law From Home

Court Grants Bail To Malabar Hill Senior Citizens|Impounds Passport On Insistence Of Estranged Daughter-in-Law

“My Daughter Beats Me, Makes Me Remain Without Clothes, Gives Food Only Once A Day” | Senior Citizen Mother

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below 

Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below

Donate to Voice For Men India

If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)

Donate Now (80G Eligible)

Follow Us

Tags: delhi high courtDomestic Violence Act 2005high court judgementsin the law
Team VFMI

Team VFMI

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us To Spread The Cause
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
mensdayout.com

Husband Sends Wife To NZ On Study Visa By Paying Rs 21 Lakhs | Wife Blocks His Mobile After Reaching

October 2, 2019
mensdayout.com

Daughter Takes Mum On Her Honeymoon; Months Later Mother Is Pregnant With Son-In-Law

January 20, 2020
mensdayout.com

Mumbai Shocker | 16-Year-Old Porn Addict Girl Forces Younger Brother For Sex Against His Consent; Now Pregnant

August 28, 2021
mensdayout.com

Accountant Left 24-Page Suicide Note Alleging Harassment And Infidelity By Wife

23
mensdayout.com

ASCI Upholds Complaint | CARS24 Sexist Ad To Be Modified Or Withdrawn By June 17

16
mensdayout.com

“I Curse Myself For Getting My Son Married As Per Indian Laws”: Story Of A Senior Citizen Father

15
voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025

Follow Us

Recent News

voiceformenindia.com

Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

April 26, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

April 25, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

January 31, 2025
voiceformenindia.com

‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

January 27, 2025

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates in your inbox!

    Voice For Men

    Voice For Men India publishes articles about Men's Rights, Gender Biased Laws, Impact on Children of Separated Parents & His Story. Do check out the "Other Side.

    Follow Us

    Browse by Category

    • 498A CASES
    • ADULTERY
    • ALIMONY
    • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
    • BLOGS
    • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
    • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • GENDER STORIES
    • HIGH COURT
    • HIS STORY
    • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
    • IN THE LAW
    • IN THE NEWS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
    • MURDER
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • OTHER COURTS
    • SPEAK UP MEN
    • SUCCESS STORY
    • SUICIDE
    • SUPREME COURT
    • Uncategorized

    Recent News

    voiceformenindia.com

    Bribery Charges By Rippling Co-Founder Prasanna Sankar Were Fabricated To Garner Public Sympathy: Chennai Police Report

    April 26, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Supreme Court Quashes Rape On Promise Of Marriage Case; Calls It Abuse Of Process Of Law

    April 25, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ ORDER | Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR After Accused Man Marries Complainant Live-in Partner

    January 31, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    ‘Domestic Violence Against Men’ Delhi HC Order Underscores Principles Of Gender Neutral Justice: Men’s Rights NGO

    January 27, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Delhi High Court Calls For Gender Neutrality In Domestic Violence Cases | Voice For Men India

    January 24, 2025
    voiceformenindia.com

    READ JUDGMENT | Can Mother Be Accused Of Abetting Son’s Girlfriend’s Suicide If She Asked Her “To Die”: Supreme Court Responds

    January 23, 2025
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Share Your Story
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    © 2019 Voice For Men India

    No Result
    View All Result
    • HOME
    • IN THE NEWS
      • ALLEGED FALSE RAPE
      • 498A CASES
      • MURDER
      • SUICIDE
      • IMPACT ON CHILDREN
      • CRIME HAS NO GENDER
      • ADULTERY
      • ALIMONY
      • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    • IN THE LAW
      • HIGH COURT
      • SUPREME COURT
      • OTHER COURTS
    • IN THE SOCIAL
      • GENDER STORIES
      • BLOGS
    • HIS STORY
      • SPEAK UP MEN
      • SUCCESS STORY
    • NON TIER-I CITIES
    • वौइस् फॉर मेंन हिंदी

    © 2019 Voice For Men India