Expressing anguish at False Rape Cases once again, the Delhi High Court remarked how invoking of provisions of sexual harassment “at the drop of a hat” to “register one’s displeasure” at the conduct of another individual, sets back the cause of women empowerment.
Justice Subramonium Prasad, while setting aside an FIR registered by Delhi Police under Sections 354A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code against an assistant professor of the Delhi University said,
This merely trivialises the offence of sexual harassment and casts a doubt on the veracity of the allegations filed by every other victim who has in reality faced sexual harassment.
Case:
The accused and the complainant in the case are neighbours who have long-pending disputes, mainly pertaining to the residential property, the petition filed before the court reveals.
The FIR alleging sexual harassment and criminal intimidation was registered against the accused in February last year on a complaint made by his neighbour. However, the accused told the court that the case was registered in an attempt to coerce and arm-twist him into withdrawing a complaint which had been filed by his wife against the complainant’s son, reported The Indian Express
Police Seeks Quashing of FIR
The police opposed the petition seeking quashing of the FIR, while arguing that the accused and his wife are habitual complainants and that both of them have filed several complaints regarding the construction that has taken place in their neighbourhood.
The accused was dismissed from an RWA post for abusing his positions and the complaints were solely filed against the residents as he was angry about his removal, the police said.
Delhi High Court
Justice Prasad in the order said that the contents of the FIR are sketchy in nature and are void of any specifics regarding the offences alleged to have been committed by the accused. The bench said,
While this Court is cognizant of the fact that an FIR is not an encyclopedia which must disclose all facts and details, however, in the instant case, a bare reading of the impugned FIR prima facie indicates that the FIR arises out of bald allegations and contradictory statements.
The court also said that the status report filed by the police also does not reveal anything about the offences being referred to in the FIR. The bench added,
The Status Report states that the Petitioner and his wife were habitual complainants and have filed multiple complaints against the construction that would take place in the neighbourhood, and therefore, it is evident that the instant FIR was maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the Petitioner, and with a view to spite him and his wife due to a private and personal grudge.
ALSO READ –
READ ORDER | False Rape Cases Cannot Be Made To Settle Personal Scores; Need To Be Dealt With Iron Hand
Delhi High Court Refuses Bail To Woman Who Threatened Man With False Rape Case If Her Demands Were Not Met
Delhi High Court’s Bold Statement | False Sexual Harassment Cases Becoming A Trend
READ ORDER | Delhi HC Refuses To Quash FIR Despite Victim Deciding to Stay With Accused As Wife
ALSO WATCH –
Shark Tank India Female Contestant | You Are Not Investing In My Business Because I Am A Woman
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
If you find value in our work, you may choose to donate to Voice For Men Foundation via Milaap OR via UPI: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank (80G tax exemption applicable)
Follow Us
