The Karnataka High Court in its judgement dated March 14, 2022 said that merely is a wife was demanding a separate house and that she was in the habit of leaving the matrimonial house, going to her sister’s and parents’ house, the same cannot be termed as “cruelty” for the purpose of seeking a decree of divorce by the husband.
A division bench of Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice S Vishwajith Shetty thus set aside the decree of divorce granted to a husband on the ground of cruelty and desertion by his wife, despite couple living separately since 2007.
The couple got married in March 2002 as per Hindu rites and customs and a daughter was born to them in June 2003. After wife left home with child and did not return, husband filed for divorce in 2007. A family court in Bengaluru granted divorce to the husband on grounds of cruelty and desertion.
The wife has now challenged this family court order in Karnataka High Court.
It was the case of the husband that his wife was demanding for setting up a separate house immediately after the marriage and because he had the responsibility of his widowed mother and a younger brother in his house, he had rejected the demand of the appellant for setting up a separate house.
Further, it was said that the wife was in a habit of quarrelling with his family members for no reason and she used to leave the matrimonial house and go to her sister’s house and mother’s house without informing him or his mother or brother. Because of this behaviour and conduct of the wife, his life was made miserable.
In January 2007, the appellant-wife without informing him left the matrimonial home along with the child and there afterwards she did not return back.
Thus, the husband had approached the Family Court, Bangalore, seeking dissolution of the marriage. It was further claimed that the wife had no intention to live with him and perform her matrimonial obligation and there are no possibilities of reconciliation and accordingly he had sought for dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruelty as well as desertion.
Husband’s Family Acquitted in 498A Case
A case was also registered by the wife against the husband and his relatives under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, wherein they have been acquitted.
Wife’s Argument to Contest Divorce:
The wife had opposed the petition and denied all the allegations levelled against her.
It was said that the judge of the Family Court has erred in granting a decree of divorce since the husband had failed to prove the ground of cruelty and desertion against the wife. The Family Court has proceeded to allow the petition mainly for the reason that the wife had filed a criminal case against the husband and his relatives.
Further, that the wife had a valid reason to stay away from her husband and therefore it cannot be said that she had deserted the husband. She accused her husband of torturing her for having not brought enough dowry and there afterwards no attempt was made by him to bring her back and instead, he got issued a legal notice immediately there afterwards seeking divorce.
Irretrievable Breakdown in Marriage
The husband has also submitted that the parties have been residing separately ever since the year 2007 and all efforts made for conciliation has failed and therefore, the marriage has irretrievably failed and there is no point in continuing such a marriage.
Further, it was said the wife had left the company of her husband without there being any valid reasons and she is also guilty of filing false complaint against her husband and his relatives only with an intention to harass and coerce them.
Karnataka High Court
Noting the allegations and defense from both sides, the bench was of the opinion that acquittal in 498-A case does not mean husband and his family was not guilty. The bench remarked,
The jurisdictional Magistrate had acquitted the accused persons in the said case (lodged by the wife against the husband) on the ground that the prosecution had failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and therefore, they were entitled for the benefit of doubt. Therefore, it cannot be said that the wife had lodged a false complaint against the husband and his family members.
Mere filing of a criminal case itself cannot be termed as “cruelty”. For the purpose of Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act, “cruelty” could be wilful and unjustifiable conduct of such character as to cause danger to life, limb or health, bodily or mental, or as to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of such a danger.
Husband failed to prove desertion
According to the high court, the husband was unable to prove by examining any independent witness that his wife was in the habit of leaving the matrimonial house and she used to go to her sister’s and parents’ house without informing him.
It also relied on Om Prakash v. Rajni where the Delhi High Court has held that demand by the wife for a separate residence would not amount to “cruelty” in all cases.
The bench further observed,
Without animus deserendi there can be no desertion within the meaning of Section 10(1)(a) of the Act. In the present case, the husband has failed to prove that the wife had intention to put an end to the marital relation and cohabitation and on the other hand, the material on record would go to show that she and her family members had made all efforts to join the husband, but they were all in vain.
With regards to husband’s plea that marriage had broken down and that there was no hope of reconciliation, the Karnataka High Court said,
A decree of divorce on the ground of irretrievable failure of the marriage can be granted only by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in exercise of its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and not by any other courts.
The Karnataka High Court thus set aside the judgement and decree passed by the court of IV additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Bangalore, dated 15th March 2016.
India is possibly the only country, where couples are not allowed to separate legally despite years and decades of living separately. If a woman deserts husband, the court justifies it as “she had valid reason”. Can a husband be granted such liberty ever? Why are husbands forced to live with domestic abusers, but women are permitted to choose their way of living with all rights as a wife?
Why does our legal system aide in massaging egos of disgruntled women, who contest divorce despite 15-years of separation?
Leave Your Comments on the tweet below:
READ JUDGEMENT | Mere Demand For Separate House By Wife Not Cruelty: Karnataka HC Sets Aside Divorce Despite Couple Being Separated Since 15YRS— Men’s Day Out (@MensDayOutIndia) March 29, 2022
▪️HC: Acquittal of Husband, his family in #498A does not mean wife filed false case@narendramodi @AmitShahhttps://t.co/h2JVgjAz3n
ALSO READ –
READ ORDER | Wife Cannot Claim Partition In Ancestral Property of Husband: Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench
Husband Can’t Use Wife’s “Private” Abortion Report To Prove Adultery: Dharwad Bench of Karnataka High Court
READ ORDER | Child Custody Denied To Father As He Remarried & Mother Would Become Lonely: Karnataka High Court
READ ORDER | Karnataka High Court Upholds Shared Parenting Order By Family Court; Lays Down Guidelines For Non-Custodial Parents
ALSO WATCH –
KBC 13 Contestant Shraddha Khare Accuses Husband Of Domestic Violence | Watch Other Side
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
Blogging about Equal Rights for Men or writing about Gender Biased Laws is often looked upon as controversial, as many 'perceive' it Anti-Women. Due to this grey area - where we demand Equality in the true sense for all genders - most brands distance themselves from advertising on a portal like ours.
We, therefore, look forward to your support as donors who understand our work and are willing to partner in this endeavour to spread this cause. Do support our work to counter one sided gender biased narratives in the media.
To make an instant donation, click on the "Donate Now" button above. For information regarding donation via Bank Transfer, click here.
Alternately, you can also donate to us via our UPI ID: voiceformenindia@hdfcbank