The Supreme Court on Wednesday began hearing arguments on the legal question of whether an adult male member other than an aggrieved woman, has a right to file an application under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, for seeking visitation rights with respect to a child.
A Bench comprising the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice AS Bopanna and Justice Hima Kohli expressed concern regarding the multiplicity of proceedings that will ensue in matrimonial disputes if a man cannot seek visitation rights in a proceeding initiated by a woman under the Domestic Violence Act.
The Bench orally observed that it is time for the Legislature to look into this issue, and see if all the issues can be brought ‘under one umbrella under one Court’.
In the present case, a case under the Domestic Violence Act was filed against the petitioner husband by his wife. On an application by the husband, the Trial Court had granted him visitation rights to visit his children under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. However, the Sessions court had set aside that order, and the High Court had upheld the Session Court’s order, reported Livelaw.
Section 21 Domestic Violence Act Custody Orders
Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the Magistrate may, at any stage of hearing of the application for protection order or for any other relief under this Act grant temporary custody of any child or children to the aggrieved person or the person making an application on her behalf and specify, if necessary, the arrangements for visit of such child or children by the respondent: Provided that if the Magistrate is of the opinion that any visit of the respondent may be harmful to the interests of the child or children, the Magistrate shall refuse to allow such visit.
The Bench made the observations in response to the Attorney General for India KK Venugopal’s submissions, whose assistance the Court had sought in 2018 with regard to the present question of law.
Referring to Section 21 of the Domestic Violence Act, which allows an aggrieved person to make an application for grant temporary custody of the child, Attorney General submitted that, the problem is that as far as an aggrieved person is concerned, it is only a woman. A man cannot be an aggrieved person under the DV Act, he said.
The Bench asked the AG if, in an ongoing family dispute, a husband is entitled to have visitation rights. The Bench added that the issue is if there is a proceeding going on, initiated by the woman under the Domestic Violence Act, the man cannot go to any other court.
In response to AG’s submission that the man could approach under a separate act, the CJI said,
You are encouraging another litigation.
AG submitted that the application for visitation rights under section 21 is for a temporary custody only and can be filed by the aggrieved woman.
The CJI however said,
You must understand, already there are enough acts, Maintenance Ac, the Guardians and Wards Act, the Domestic Violence Act, 4-5 acts are there. They’ve to move from Court to Court. Now we are adding another Court. It’s time for legislature to look into this.
The AG referred to the doctrine of Parens Patriae and submitted that there are a series of judgements that have said that in regard to child’s custody the paramount consideration is the child’s welfare. He quoted,
The question is, can a husband come directly to HC and invoke parens patriae jurisdiction on basis that otherwise he will have to go under various other Acts and the High Court has inherent jurisdiction so it could then decide upon interim custody until wife or husband goes to court and applies for permanent custody.
Parens patriae would be the jurisdiction if he doesn’t move under the Guardians and Wards Act, Special Marriage Act or the Hindu Marriage Act, which have separate sections for custody.
To this CJI questioned,
Sorry to say, the question is complicating things. We want simple solution to problems. Here is a simple case where a husband wants visitation rights, why doesn’t legislature look into this angle?
Adding further CJI Ramana said,
We are talking about general consequences of these kinds of cases. Husband has no right to approach under domestic violence act for visitation courts, he has to move a separate OP before civil court. Matter is going on before the Domestic Violence Court and wife has to appear. Why don’t you bring all the issues under one umbrella under one court?
AG submitted that so far as the relationship is concerned, it consists of holistic rights in both parties. He added that if a wife approaches the Court for any right whatsoever, the man gets a right to ask for visiting if he is in the custody of children. However, if she is self-reliant and doesn’t want alimony, residence etc., there’s nothing the man can do unless he goes under other acts. He added,
Otherwise, I will suggest parens patriae (moving before concerned court invoking parent patriae jurisdiction).
The AG sought to submit a note with regard to this along with some judgements.
The Bench then asked the AG to submit a note of his submissions to assist the court. The matter will be taken up after two weeks.
ALSO READ –
Introduce Concept Of Shared Parenting At Initial Stages In Marriage Disputes: Punjab HC To Govt
READ ORDER | Parents Cannot Be Guest In The Life Of Children; Tripura HC Orders Shared Parenting
READ ORDER | Karnataka High Court Upholds Shared Parenting Order By Family Court; Lays Down Guidelines For Non-Custodial Parents
Bombay HC Allows Access Between Father & Son After Divorced Mother Withdraws Shared Parenting Consent
Greece Adopts Shared Parenting Law Amidst Opposition From Human Rights & Women Rights Organisations
ALSO WATCH –
I Am Sorry… Says Faridabad Woman Who Lowered Son From 9th To 8th Floor Balcony To Pick Up Garment
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
Blogging about Equal Rights for Men or writing about Gender Biased Laws is often looked upon as controversial, as many 'perceive' it Anti-Women. Due to this grey area - where we demand Equality in the true sense for all genders - most brands distance themselves from advertising on a portal like ours.
We, therefore, look forward to your support as donors who understand our work and are willing to partner in this endeavour to spread this cause. Do support our work to counter one sided gender biased narratives in the media.
To make an instant donation, click on the "Donate Now" button above. For information regarding donation via Bank Transfer, click here.
Alternately, you can also donate to us via our UPI ID: [email protected]
Leave a Reply